Âé¶¹´«Ã½

Portfolio Evaluations


The Âé¶¹´«Ã½building Fund embraces its central role in contributing to the knowledge base on what works and what doesn¡¯t when supporting conflict-affected communities. Underpinning this work is a monitoring and evaluation function that stresses learning as well as accountability.

Ensuring high-quality evaluation is a shared responsibility between the PBF and fund recipients, with responsibility for mandatory project evaluations resting with fund recipients, while evaluations of whole country portfolios are undertaken by the Âé¶¹´«Ã½building Support Office.

?

Evaluation Framework in PBF-Eligible Countries


? Evaluability assessments Project evaluations Portfolio evaluations
Frequency First 6-9 months of implementation Mid-term and/or end of each project End of 5-year eligibility cycle
Objectives & methods
  • Programme design and M&E review for early adjustments
  • Participatory
  • PBSO-managed
  • Outcome-level assessments
  • Mixed methods
  • Recipient-managed, PBSO-supported
  • Outcome-level assessment
  • Mixed methods
  • PBSO-managed
?BURUNDI

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2014 - 2020?English

?

?COTE D'IVOIRE

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2015 - 2019??|?

?

?GUATEMALA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2016 - 2019 English?

?

?

?LIBERIA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2017 - English

?

?PAPUA NEW GUINEA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2015 - 2017 English

?

?CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ??2014?- 2018/19??|?? ? ?

?

?EL SALVADOR

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2017 - 2023?Spanish

?

?GUINEA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2017?- 2022?French

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2012 - 2016 French

?

?MADAGASCAR

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2021?English

?

?SOMALIA

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2019 - English

?

?CHAD

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2017 - 2022?French

?

?GAMBIA

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2017 - 2022?English

?

?KYRGYZSTAN

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2018 - 2020 - English

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2017 - English

?

?MALI

?

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2014 - 2018?|?

?