Âé¶¹´«Ã½

UNDT/2020/113

UNDT/2020/113, Dolgopolov

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Given that the decision not to lift the Applicant’s immunity is not an administrative decision capable of judicial review, the request for compensation for any harm caused by such decision is consequently also beyond the scope of the Tribunal’s competence. The Applicant failed to request management evaluation of the Administration’s refusal of his claim for compensation. This part of his application is therefore not receivable under art. 8.1(c) of the Tribunal’s Statute and staff rule 11.2(a).

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Decision not to lift the Applicant’s immunity to file a lawsuit against a Ukrainian official for slander and the Administration’s rejection of his request for compensation for “loss of opportunity to get remedy for the slander†caused by said official.

Legal Principle(s)

The decision not to lift a staff member’s immunity is not an administrative decision capable of judicial review.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Dolgopolov
Entity
DM
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type