UNDT/2018/097, Mindua
The Applicant, as an ad litem judge of the ICTY, is considered to be a “non-Secretariat United Nations officialâ€. It follows that the Applicant cannot be considered as a former United Nations staff member within the meaning of art. 3.1 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute. Whilst being fully cognizant of the Applicant’s right to access to justice, the Tribunal is forced to apply its Statute, which prevents it from asserting jurisdiction over the application. As the Applicant does not fall under any of the categories of potential applicants described in art. 3.1 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute, he has no legal standing before this Tribunal and the application is not receivable ratione personae.
The Applicant, a former ad litem judge at the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (“ICTYâ€), challenges the decision of the Registrar, ICTY, not to pay him for his part–time service at the ICTY after he was appointed as a judge at the International Criminal Court.
The Tribunal’s competence ratione personae is defined in art. 3.1 of its Statute.