Âé¶¹´«Ã½

UNDT/2013/141

UNDT/2013/141, Bofill

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal did not find any exceptional circumstances, and found that the application was not receivable, ratione temporis.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged her non-promotion to the D-1 level during the 2010 and 2011 Annual Promotions Sessions and the lack of answer of the UNHCR Administration to her request for management evaluation of these decisions; however the Applicant clearly filed her application with the UNDT after the applicable time limits had elapsed. The Applicant alleged the existence of exceptional circumstances that would warrant a waiver or extension of the applicable time limits in her case.

Legal Principle(s)

Summary judgment is appropriate in case the Tribunal finds an application not receivable, ratione temporis, an issue that may be assessed as a matter of law even without serving the application to the Respondent and even if not raised by the parties. Ratione temporis: Time limits are to be strictly enforced; a delay can generally be excused only because of circumstances beyond an applicant’s control. Management evaluation: Pursuant to the provisions on the management evaluation process, the Administration’s obligation to reply within certain time limits does not correspond to an individual right to a response to a request for management evaluation; the only effect of a lack of response is a direct access to the Tribunal by submitting an application within the statutory timeframe.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Bofill
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type